More transcript drama: A diplomat suddenly remembers the quid pro quo

In a stunning reversal that further confirms the notion of a quid pro quo, US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland says that after he first testified, he began to remember fresh details about a link between US security aid and Ukrainian investigations of President Donald Trump's political rival Joe Biden.

Sondland filed and the House Intelligence Committee released a three-page sworn addendum to congressional testimony Tuesday in which he said that reading testimony from other witnesses reminded him of some key details. Here they are:

The conversation -- He does now recall telling a Ukrainian official on September 1 that military and security aid was directly tied to a public commitment from Ukraine to investigate meddling in the 2016 US election and, separately, Burisma, the company that put Hunter Biden on its board.
The text message -- September 1 is the same day Bill Taylor, the top US official who was raising the alarm in Ukraine, texted Sondland the message, "Are we now saying that security assistance and White House meeting are conditioned on investigations?" Sondland replied then with a "call me."
The Warsaw meeting -- He transmitted this message to a Ukrainian political aide, Andriy Yermak, on the sidelines of a meeting in Warsaw between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Vice President Mike Pence.
Conditions for release of aid -- The public statement would have to come straight from Ukraine's President, but Sondland can't remember if it was Rudy Giuliani, the President's personal lawyer or Kurt Volker, the US special envoy for Ukraine who told him that.
Memory still fuzzy -- He can't remember how many times he talked to President Trump between September 6-9, when he texted "no quid pro quo" to Taylor.
Cut off -- The White House won't give him access to phone logs so he can figure it out.
No disagreement -- Sondland has no reason to doubt the testimony of Taylor or Tim Morrison, the NSC Russia expert who corroborated him.

Why is this so important?

Sondland is the GOP donor and political appointee who was in direct contact at times with Trump about Ukraine. And now he remembers what amounts to a direct quid pro quo, although he still can't remember everything.

Tale of the transcripts

Sondland's new memory is far from the only big news from the impeachment inquiry today. The House Intelligence Committee released transcripts of testimony by Sondland and former special envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker.

CNN's had a team reading through both sets of transcripts line-by-line and writing on them in real time.

Here are some of the new things we've learned:

He worked with Giuliani to press Ukraine to make public statement about investigation, suggested it could air on Fox News
He said he called Energy Secretary Rick Perry the day before his deposition to refresh his memory of July 10 meeting
He saw Trump one time after the Ukraine story broke. Trump told him to tell the truth.
He did not recall details of White House meeting with Ukrainian officials that was described by others as contentious

This White House response

Here, printed in full, is the response from White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham:

"Both transcripts released today show there is even less evidence for this illegitimate impeachment sham than previously thought. Ambassador Sondland squarely states that he 'did not know, (and still does not know) when, why or by whom the aid was suspended.' He also said he 'presumed' there was a link to the aid—but cannot identify any solid source for that assumption. By contrast, Volker's testimony confirms there could not have been a quid pro quo because the Ukrainians did not know about the military aid hold at the time. No amount of salacious media-biased headlines, which are clearly designed to influence the narrative, change the fact that the President has done nothing wrong."

What whistleblower?

What's not really an issue in either transcript or the White House response is the whistleblower, whose importance to the impeachment case against Trump is waning even as the President's focus on the whistleblower grows.

And that's a real problem since under US law, the person in charge of protecting the whistleblower is ... Trump.

I spent time looking into what protections US law actually provides whistleblowers. They're not what you think.

The Podcast

CNN political director David Chalian discusses the electoral implications with CNN chief political analyst Gloria Borger and CNN White House reporter Maegan Vazquez talked about Sen. Rand Paul's call, standing next to Trump in Kentucky, for the media to report on the identity of the whistleblower. It's Election Day in Kentucky and the governor is on the ballot. Listen here.

What's coming

What transcripts will be released tomorrow? We don't yet know.

Who will testify? We don't entirely know.

Investigators have requested testimony from Energy Secretary Rick Perry, acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought, State Department counselor Ulrich Brechbuhl and David Hale, another State Department official.

What else?

The House asked White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney to testify. That seems unlikely. Two other White House aides did not show for their testimony Tuesday.

But a top adviser to Vice President Mike Pence, Jennifer Williams, is expected to talk to impeachment investigators Thursday. She's a longtime State Department official and was on the July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Jim Jordan, a top Trump ally, will likely move temporarily to the House Intelligence Committee, giving the President another key ally in all proceedings.

The Department of Justice says in a new memo that witnesses must be able to bring a government lawyer. They have, until now, brought only personal attorneys. The idea is that the President must also be represented in the proceedings. It's not clear yet how the House investigators will respond and whether they'll challenge the memo in court.

Lev Parnas, a Giuliani associate who has been arrested on criminal charges, has started talks with impeachment investigators through his attorney.

What are we doing here?

The President has invited foreign powers to interfere in the US presidential election.

Democrats want to impeach him for it.

It is a crossroads for the American system of government as the President tries to change what's acceptable for US politicians. This newsletter will focus on this consequential moment in US history.

Keep track of documents and hearings with CNN's Impeachment Tracker. See a timeline of events here. And get your full refresher on who's who in this drama here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)