Los Angeles teachers will strike today, leaving 600,000 students in limbo

More than 32,000 Los Angeles teachers and staff members will walk off the job Monday in the country's second-biggest school district. That means about 600,000 kids will have no idea when they'll see their teachers again.

Weeks of heated negotiations between the United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) union and the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) went nowhere, leading to the city's first teachers' strike in 30 years.

"We did not receive a proposal over the weekend, and we will be striking tomorrow," UTLA Secretary Arlene Inouye said Sunday night.

Both the union and the school district say they want smaller class sizes, bigger teacher salaries, and more counselors and nurses in the district's roughly 1,000 schools.

The big debate revolves around how much to fund them.

While the adults keep struggling to find a resolution, students will still be expected to go to school during the strike.

Despite the expected absences of 32,000 teachers and staff, classes will continue at all schools. About 600,000 students could be taught by more than 2,000 reassigned administrators and about 400 substitute teachers, the school district said.

Exactly how that will work out logistically remains uncertain.

"It's case by case, school by school," said Shannon Haber, chief communications officer for LAUSD.

But the massive teachers shortage Monday is enough to make Andrew Krowne keep his four LAUSD children home for as long as the strike lasts.

"It's just a sheer overwhelming number of children versus adults," he said. "I'm not risking my children's safety."

Numbers and accusations fly

While both UTLA and LAUSD have made some concessions, both the union and the school district accuse the other of giving misleading facts and figures.

In LAUSD's latest offer to the union Friday, the school district said it "would add nearly 1,200 more educators -- teachers, counselors, nurses and librarians -- in schools, reducing class size in thousands of classrooms."

Class sizes in grades four to six would be limited to 35 students, and class sizes in all middle and high school math and English classes would be limited to 39 students, the school district said.

The offer would also "ensure no increase in any class size, increase nurses, counselors and librarians at all schools, along with a 6% salary increase and back pay for the 2017-2018 school year," LAUSD said.

But union president Alex Caputo-Pearl said the offer was good for only one year and that the school district's proposal was "woefully inadequate."

The union wants LAUSD to pull from its $1.86 billion in reserves to increase school staffing and to boost teachers' salaries by 6.5%.

"We have been in negotiations with LAUSD since April 2017. We have been working without a contract for almost one year," UTLA said in a statement.

But the school district says its pockets aren't nearly as deep as the teachers' union suggests.

"School budgets in California are set in three-year increments, and from July 2018 to June 2021, Los Angeles Unified will spend $24 billion educating students. This includes its entire, existing $1.8 billion reserve," LAUSD said.

The school district said at this rate, it might not even have enough money to meet a required 1% reserve by the 2021-2022 school year.

"Our commitment to our families is to make sure all of the money we have is being spent in schools. We are doing that," LAUSD Superintendent Austin Beutner said in a statement.

The financial situation is so bad, the Los Angeles County Office of Education is stepping in. Last week, the state-funded regulatory agency assigned fiscal experts to work with the school district on a plan to "eliminate deficit spending and restore required financial reserve levels."

And the Los Angeles school board has ordered the superintendent to come up with a three-year "enterprise plan" to get more revenue.

The board gave Beutner a March 18 deadline "for creating a plan that could include parcel tax and school bond measures, as well as strategies for increasing enrollment."

'Parents are caught in the middle'

While the union and school district are stuck at an impasse, parents are also in a difficult position.

"I feel like parents are caught in the middle of these two big forces that are in charge of looking out for our children," said Evelyn Alemán, the mother of a 14-year-old high school freshman.

"I think most parents agree with what the teachers are asking for. We definitely want smaller class sizes. We definitely want teachers to be appropriately compensated," she said.

But as far as the planned strike goes, "I don't agree with the way it's taking place right now."

The big question for parents is whether to send their children to school during the strike, with so few adults replacing 32,000 missing educators.

Krowne, the father of four LAUSD students, said he's keeping his kids home even though the school district will not excuse students' absences due to the strike.

"If five teachers showed up, everyone's going to be watching movies in the auditorium," he predicted.

"There's not instruction happening. Why the hell do would I send my kids to daycare with hundreds and hundreds of kids? My kids would be safer at home with their parents. Frankly, my kids will learn more at home."

LA school district offers a guide for families on how to prepare for the strike

But Alemán said she'll definitely send her daughter to school, even if she's taught by someone other than her regular teachers. She said any school instruction is better than nothing.

But for some other parents "it's a toss-up," Alemán said. "For those parents who have children who have special needs, in special education, they're just not sure if the folks who are taking care of them that day will be able to support the needs of their children."

CNN's Stephanie Becker and Ralph Ellis contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

from CNN.com - RSS Channel https://cnn.it/2AJg3vt

Bagikan Berita Ini